(1) They may elect "privileged foreign" status for the merchandise. This locks in the product's duty rate according to its condition at the time it is admitted into the FTZ; or
(2) They may elect "nonprivileged foreign" status for the merchandise. This will subject the goods to duty according to their condition and applicable duty rates at the time the goods (or merchandise made therefrom) is withdrawn from the FTZ for consumption in the United States.Some examples may help to illustrate these principles, as follows:
Example 1. In December, 1992, Acme Company enters a chemical valued at $10,000 into an FTZ subzone with "nonprivileged foreign" status. If the chemical were imported for consumption in December, 1992, it would be dutiable at a rate of 20% ad valorem, for a duty payment of $2,000.
Acme withdraws the chemical, unchanged in condition, from the FTZ for consumption, in February, 1993. At this time, assume that the rate of duty for the chemical has been reduced to 18% ad valorem [e.g., pursuant to a "Uruguay Round" tariff reduction]. Acme would pay duty on the chemical at the 18% ad valorem rate, for a total duty payment of $1,800, and a duty savings of $200.Similar benefits are available when manufacturing operations are conducted in an FTZ subzone:
Example 2: Assume that Acme Corporation manufactures bulk photographic chemicals at an FTZ subzone factory, using materials of domestic and foreign origin. The chemical, if imported directly into the United States, would be subject to duty at a rate of 8.5% ad valorem.
Assume further that Acme manufactures the photographic chemical using $10,000 worth of foreign-made nigrosine dye which, if imported directly, would be dutiable at a rate of 20% ad valorem, resulting in a duty payment of $2000.
Acme would elect "nonprivileged foreign" status for the nigrosine dye when entering it into the FTZ. When the finished bulk photographic chemical is withdrawn from the FTZ for consumption, Acme would pay duty on the value of the nigrosine dye at the 8.5% ad valorem duty applicable to the finished chemical, i.e., $10,000 x 8.5% = $850, for a duty savings of $1150.Please note that no duties are assessed in respect of any value added by manufacturing in the FTZ. Rather, duties are assessed on the dutiable "transaction value" of imported components at the time they enter the FTZ.
Example 3: Assume that, in making the bulk photographic chemicals discussed in the example above, Acme imports $10,000 worth of an ingredient which, if imported directly, would be subject to duty at a rate of 3% ad valorem. By electing "privileged foreign" status for this ingredient, Acme could "lock in" the 3% ad valorem duty rate. When the finished photographic chemical is withdrawn from the FTZ for United States consumption, Acme would still pay duties on the value of this imported ingredient--but at the 3% ad valorem rate of duty which would have applied had this ingredient been imported directly into the United States, rather than at the 8.5% duty rate which would be applicable to the finished photographic chemical.FTZ operators may request both "privileged" and "nonprivileged foreign" status for different imported ingredients used to make a single product in an FTZ. Thus, in the examples given above, Acme could elect "nonprivileged foreign" status for the nigrosine dye and "privileged foreign" status for the other ingredient, thus insuring maximum duty savings.
(1) Duty savings resulting from "inverted tariff" benefits, as discussed above;
(2) Deferral of payment of Customs duties until after imported materials have been used in manufacture, and finished goods are ready to be withdrawn for consumption;
(3) Elimination of need for duty drawback programs with respect to exported merchandise. (The cash flow from FTZ operations is superior to that realized in drawback, since the importer need not make an "up front" payment of Customs duties);
(4) Exemption from, or deferral of, many state and local taxes.Obviously, there is some added expense associated with operating a company's facilities as an FTZ subzone; however, many companies have found that these added costs are more than offset by the long-term tariff benefits available.
|
Home I Overview I Areas of Practice Our Attorneys I Firm Highlights I NP Trade Resource Library Hot Topics I Reading Room I Links I Contact Us |
|
The material on this site is protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and international conventions, and is the exclusive property of Neville Peterson LLP or any licensee. All rights reserved. © Neville Peterson LLP 2002. |
![]() |